The
evidence is clear but there are still so many commentators out there who just
don't get it. Lord Young and Professor Löfstedt's reviews both concluded that
it is NOT the regulations that lead to ridiculous decisions on health and
safety grounds, but rather the over interpretation and over application of
regulations in inappropriate and disproportionate ways.
Health
and Safety Executive’s (HSE) Myth Busters Challenge Panel has demonstrated this
to be true in more than 200 cases it has looked at over the last 15 months.
When 'health and safety' is not being used as a convenient excuse - or
non-existent rules being created - it seems even sensible regulations are being
applied in silly ways.
No
one would reasonably argue that an industrial electric pressure washer used by
a variety of operators on a busy construction site should not be subject to
regular tests to ensure that it is in a safe condition. Common sense and proper
proportion would tell most of us the same level of testing for kettles and
computers in offices is over the top. Indeed the regulations have never
required it - but that didn't stop some people acting alone or guided by
unqualified ‘health and safety advisers’ from interpreting them in that way.
We've seen again this
week health and safety "rules" being lambasted as "half
baked" in the national press. This time the story is about Georgie Hippolite
from the Isle of Wight, whose mum baked cakes to sell at school for a charity.
Because her mum didn't have a food hygiene qualification, she was told
they couldn't be sold - because of "health and safety”. A perfect cue for
the comment pages to go into overdrive, mocking the deadly dangers of cooking a
Sunday roast or the hidden threats which lurk in every kitchen. This reaction
is amusing up to a point. But we at CRS struggle with any argument that blames
the regulations for turning us into a nation of cowards and scaredy-cats,
obsessed with red tape and bureaucracy and hell bent on stopping people doing
harmless and very low risk activities. We have looked at all 200 or so of
the mythbuster cases HSE has dealt with. We’re sure the cases are not made up -
many of them you literally couldn't make up, they're so silly. Only this week
we heard of parasols being banned at a racecourse on grounds of you-know-what.
Apparently, they could be used as a weapon.
This
problem of over application is a real one, but until we can get more people to
see that the problem is one of "overcooking” the rules, not the rules
themselves being "half baked”, our rate of progress is going to be
limited. But it's not been all bad in the press this week. Dr Mike Esbester, of
Portsmouth University, reached some interesting conclusions after studying the
history of health and safety. You can read them in this report in the Telegraph .
Given the cooking theme of this blog, we only really need to say two words to
Dr Mike - well done!
No comments:
Post a Comment