Women working in jobs where they are exposed to certain chemicals may
have a greater risk of developing breast cancer, a study suggests. The
international research by the Occupational and Environmental Health
Research Group at Stirling University studied more than 2,000 women.
They
found that women who worked for 10 years in jobs classified as "highly
exposed" increased their risk by 42%. The team has called for further
research on the subject.
Researchers from Canada, the US and the
UK all took part in the study, which monitored 1,006 women with breast
cancer and 1,147 without the disease in Southern Ontario, Canada.
Dr
James Brophy, from Occupational and Environmental Health Research Group
(OEHRG), said: "Breast cancer causality is complex. It is believed to
result from a combination of factors including genetic, hormonal and
lifestyle influences as well as environmental exposures. However,
studies have shown that breast cancer incidence rose throughout the
developed world during in the second half of the 20th Century as women
entered industrial workplaces and many new and untested chemicals were
being introduced. Diverse and concentrated exposures to carcinogens and
hormone disrupting chemicals in some workplaces can put workers at an
increased risk for developing cancer."
The researchers said
although the study focused on Ontario, where there is extensive
manufacturing and agriculture, its findings have relevance to women
working in a variety of industries across the globe.
Professor
Andrew Watterson, head of the OEHRG and a co-investigator on the
project, said: "Many workers face multiple exposures to chemicals, not
only from their employment, but from their everyday environment. Many of
the women included in the study were exposed to a virtual 'toxic soup'
of chemicals. Untangling work and wider factors in the possible causes
of breast cancer is an important global issue."
The study found
several occupational sectors in which there appeared to be an elevated
breast cancer risk, including manufacture of plastics for use in the
automobile industry, farming and metalworking.
Some experts have
cast doubt on whether the statistical analysis used to interpret the
data in the study gives an accurate assessment of true risk. In a
statement, the American Chemistry Council also expressed its concerns,
saying that the authors could be "over-interpreting their results and
unnecessarily alarm workers". It added: "This study included no data
showing if there was actual chemical exposure, from what chemicals, at
what levels, and over what period of time in any particular workplace.
Although this is an important area of research, these findings are
inconsistent with other research. This study should not be used to draw
any conclusions about the cause of cancer patterns in workers."
Dr
Brophy called for further research to be funded as a matter of urgency.
He said: "The study of occupational risks for breast cancer is a
neglected area of research. This study points to the value of including
detailed work histories in the environmental and occupational
epidemiology of breast cancer."
CRS
provides a suite of competency-based short-course training on a variety
of subjects including the control of substances which may be hazardous
to health (COSHH).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-20366589
No comments:
Post a Comment