CRS
reports that experts at the World Health Organisation (WHO) now say
diesel engine exhaust fumes can cause cancer in humans. They say they
belong in the same potentially deadly category as asbestos, arsenic and
mustard gas.
After a week-long meeting, the International Agency
for Research on Cancer reclassified diesel exhausts from its group of
probable carcinogens, to its group of substances that have definite
links to cancer. It says diesel emissions cause lung cancer and increase
the risk of bladder cancer. They say their decision was unanimous and
based on "compelling" scientific evidence. The director of New York's
Clean Fuels and Vehicles Project, Rich Kassel, has told CNN the WHO has
confirmed what has been suspected for some time. "Anybody who lives in
Beijing, Mexico, New York or any congested city has probably felt the
feeling of holding their breath when the bus pulls away from the curb
leaving you in a ... puff of black smoke," he said. "This study
basically confirms that we're right to hold our breath when the bus
pulls away." The pollution that we care about from diesel - buses,
trucks and other diesel engines - is technically called particulate
matter. We all know it is soot. It's fine, fine particles that are small
enough to get past our throat, past our lungs into the deepest part,
the deepest of our lungs, where they trigger asthma attacks, bronchitis,
emphysema, heart disease and now of course we've learned cancer."
The
WHO has acknowledged tougher fuel regulation has led to improved diesel
quality and trucks do not billow big clouds of soot so often anymore.
But it says it is not yet clear whether these changes have reduced the
risks. The Cancer Council's chief executive, Professor Ian Olver, says
the WHO also has not confirmed what levels of exposure cause cancer.
"Most of the data in the world relates to occupational exposure, such as
diesel equipment in mines, or transport, particularly railway workers,
exposed to diesel," he said. "So the first group that we ought to be
looking at are those that [are exposed] to the heavy diesel output
machinery." Professor Olver says there is no data available for the
levels of exposure in cities. "The difficulty is that all the
pollutants, whether it is a petrol engine or a diesel engine, are all
mixed together and that is why the data upon which this was based had to
be the more specialised sort of high-level exposure of various
occupations," he said.
Andrew Bourne has been in the diesel fuel injection industry for
more than 30 years, and runs a diesel business in Toowoomba in
Queensland. "We're certainly dealing with emissions every day," he said.
"The machines that we see coming through our business have health
problems with either the engine or the fuel system and as a result of
that, often their emissions are one of the main tell-tales. But he says
although his workplace may be more exposed to exhaust than most - his
workers' general health is fine. "It's not as if we actively breathe in
exhaust fumes. When we are testing vehicles, we tend to try and avoid it
[and have] an open-air area to do that," he said. Mr Bourne says the
WHO's announcement is a good reminder. "Perhaps we might be
more
aware. We already do take measures to protect ourselves from those
fumes," he said. "We direct exhaust fumes outside of our building
through piping from the exhaust. Perhaps with these findings we might be
a little more careful with making sure that we evacuate that gas more
actively."
If you want to know more about substances hazardous to health, CRS’s COSHH training programmes are an ideal way to achieve this.
No comments:
Post a Comment